American International Group Inc (NYSE:AIG) – AIG Reports First Quarter 2014 ...





[Business Wire] - American International Group, Inc. today reported net income attributable to AIG of $1.6 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to $2.2 billion for the first quarter of 2013.Read more on this.

American International Group, Inc. (AIG), with a current value of $77.19B, started trading this morning at $52.00. Shares have traded today between $51.71 and $52.74 per share with a trailing 52-week range being $41.53 to $53.33. AIG (AIG) shares are currently priced at 12.20x this year's forecasted earnings, which makes them relatively inexpensive compared to the industry's 16.68x earnings multiple for the same period. And for income investors, the company pays shareholders $0.50 per share annually in dividends, yielding 1.00%. In a review of the consensus earnings estimate this quarter, 25 sell-side analysts are looking at $1.07 per share, which would be $0.27 worse than the year-ago quarter and a $0.00 sequential decrease. Furthermore, our analysis shows the full-year EPS estimate to be $4.29, which would be a $0.27 worse when compared to the last year's annual results. The quarterly earnings estimate is predicated on a consensus revenue forecast of $9.35 Billion. If reported, that would be a 9.23% increase over the year-ago quarter. In terms of ratings, Standpoint Research Initiated AIG at Buy (Jun 28, 2013). Previously, Barclays upgraded AIG from Equal Weight to Overweight. The average price target for AIG shares by the analysts covering the stock is $55.95, which is 7.60% above where the stock opened this morning. Summary (NYSE:AIG) : American International Group, Inc. provides insurance products and services for the commercial, institutional, and individual customers in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments: AIG Property Casualty, and AIG Life and Retirement. The AIG Property Casualty segment offers casualty insurance products that cover general liability, commercial automobile liability, workers' compensation, excess casualty, and crisis management insurance; industrial energy-related and commercial property insurance products, which cover exposures to man-made and natural disasters; aerospace, environmental, political risk, trade credit, surety and marine insurance products for small and medium sized enterprises; and various forms of professional liability insurance products. It also provides personal accidental and supplemental health products for individuals, employees, associations, and other organizations; and life products, as well as a range of travel insurance products and services for leisure and business travelers. This segment distributes its insurance products and services through brokers, agents, and direct marketing and partner organizations, as well as the Internet. The AIG Life and Retirement segment offers a suite of products and services to individuals and groups, including term life insurance, universal life insurance, accident and health insurance, fixed and variable group annuities, administrative and compliance services, mutual funds, and financial planning. This segment distributes its products through banks, broker-dealers, financial advisors, independent marketing organizations, insurance agents, structured settlement brokers, benefit consultants, and direct-to-consumer platforms. The company also provides private residential mortgage guaranty insurance and direct investment book services; and derivatives intermediary services. American International Group, Inc. was founded in 1919 and is based in New York, New York. Tag Helper ~ Stock Code: AIG | Common Company name: AIG | Full Company name: American International Group Inc (NYSE:AIG) .

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/RmxR66

Source : http://ift.tt/RmxR66

The strange saga of the 1978 Oakland A's



Last week, on a piece on the Brewers, I presented the following chart, a list of all teams who played .750 or better in April with at least 20 games played (the Brewers ended up one win short of that percentage):

As you can see, 17 of the 18 teams would finish above .500. So who were the 1978 Oakland A's and what happened to them?

I guess the simple answer is they were a bad team that had one hot month. The 1977 A's went 63-98, finishing behind the expansion Mariners; the 1979 A's would go 54-108. So the fact that the '78 A's finished 69-93 despite their 16-5 April maybe isn't all that surprising or interesting.

But the story of the '78 A's certainly is interesting, even beyond a good April.

Some quick background in case you're not familiar with this time. The A's won World Series in 1972, 1973 and 1974, in the years before free agency. That dynasty began crumbling after the third championship when the A's lost Catfish Hunter to free agency via a technicality -- owner Charlie Finley had failed to pay $50,000 into an insurance annuity for Hunter as required in his contract. Hunter went to arbitration and was declared a free agent, signing with the Yankees. This was before real free agency would begin after the 1976 season. The A's won their fifth straight AL West title in 1975 without Hunter, but lost the ALCS to the Red Sox.

In April of 1976, with free agency looming after that season, Finley traded Reggie Jackson and Ken Holtzman to the Orioles for Don Baylor, Mike Torrez and Paul Mitchell. That June, Finley agreed to sell Vida Blue to the Yankees and Rollie Fingers and Joe Rudi to the Red Sox for a total of $3.5 million. "I plan to use this money to great advantage. We'll be able to purchase a lot of players at the end of the season," Finley said. Fingers and Rudi actually dressed for a game in Red Sox uniforms but weren't allowed to play. Instead, commissioner Bowie Kuhn blocked the deals, leading to a Sports Illustrated cover that read "Baseball in Chaos."

Under manager Chuck Tanner that club stole an all-time record 341 bases and went 87-75, finishing in second place. But that was it for the Oakland dynasty. Rudi and Baylor signed with the Angels. Fingers and Gene Tenace signed with the Padres. Sal Bando signed with the Brewers. Bert Campaneries signed with the Rangers. In March, Phil Garner was traded to the Pirates and Claudell Washington to the Rangers. Torrez was traded in April to the Yankees. Blue made it through the 1977 season but was traded in March of 1978 to the Giants.

So that's where the A's stood entering the 1978 season, a team of kids and nobodies with an owner who didn't market the team or invest in scouts (at one point, the A's had no scouts, relying on reports from the Major League Baseball Scouting Bureau). Bobby Winkles, who had replaced Jack McKeon during the 1977 season, was the manager. Winkles had been the longtime coach at Arizona State before moving to the major leagues and had spent a season and a half managing the Angels. McKeon remained on the staff as a coach.

The A's lost two of three in Anaheim to start the season but then swept four at home against the Mariners, including two shutouts. After splitting two games with the Angels they won eight in a row, again sweeping the Mariners with the help of two more shutouts. The final two games of that streak were 14-inning and 12-inning wins at home against the Twins. Nobody was going to the games, however. After drawing 17,283 for their home opener, the A's hadn't drawn more than 5,000 to any subsequent games. After a couple losses, they won five more in a row. On May 5, they beat the Tigers at home as John Henry Johnson pitched a four-hitter. They even drew 14,612 fans. At that point, they were 19-5 and the staff ERA was 1.71.

It would be the high point of the season. They were shut out their next three games. On May 22, with the team 24-15 and still in first place, Winkles resigned as manager, unable to deal with Finley's daily phone calls and managerial advice. Sports Illustrated reported, Last week Bobby Winkles, who had managed a collection of low-salaried kids and has-beens to first place in the American League West, chucked his job because Finley had become just too much. There were reports that Finley had been considering putting earphones on Winkles so he could communicate with him directly in the dugout. Meanwhile, Finley kept calling him on the phone at home. A typical early-morning call to Winkles would command, "Get up! Only whores make their living in bed." When Winkles recently spent a day off visiting Napa Valley vineyards and was unreachable by phone, Finley raged, "If you ever do that again, you can go someplace else." After Winkles finally phoned (ah, the irony) Charlie to tell him he was quitting, Finley was moved to concede, "Maybe my telephone calls were driving him to the nut house." [+] Enlarge



The team's traveling secretary also served as the team statistician. The players were complaining because Finley wouldn't pay for a batting practice pitcher who threw left-handed. One of the players used to go to a local restaurant that videotaped A's games, because the A's themselves didn't have videotape equipment.

McKeon returned to the manager's role and the A's actually kept possession of first place through June 13. That June, the A's had two first-round picks and drafted high school pitchers Mike Morgan and Tim Conroy. Even though the A's were still battling for first place, Finley decided to have both kids begin their professional careers in the majors. Morgan made three starts, tossing a complete game in his debut (a 3-0 loss) a week after graduating from high school. He'd pitched more than seven innings just once in high school. Conroy started twice and lasted a total of 4.2 innings, walking nine and striking out none, although the A's managed to win both games.

Finley's rationale for starting them? If they aren't ready for the majors, the world would know soon enough, he said. After Morgan's debut, which drew 17,000 fans to the Oakland Coliseum, McKeon was asked if Morgan would start again. He said he didn't know. Finley, sitting next to him, whispered in his ear. "We've just discussed it," McKeon said. "He'll be in the rotation." Morgan got hammered his next two starts, both Oakland losses.

Relief pitcher Bob Lacey said starting the two teenagers five times was a message that the A's "don't want it." He then ripped McKeon and the coaches, saying the A's bunted too much, weren't being properly motivated and had too many late-inning pinch-hitters, pinch-runners and subs. "We need a new philosophy and a new manager," Lacey said.

In late June and early July they won of eight of nine to climb back into first on July 5, with a record of 43-39 (four teams in the AL West were within a game of each other). Still, Finley was still bothering his manager with phone calls. McKeon told this story to Baseball Prospectus several years ago: So I'm managing, and we bring up this kid from Jersey City in the Eastern League who is leading the league in steals with something like 62. His name was Darrell Woodard. Charlie told me, "You don't know anything about this guy, but I'll fill you in. He's a rabbit, and you should try to use him every day to pinch-run if you can." Charlie used to call guys who could run "rabbits" and guys who couldn't run were "trucks." He added that in the event that I had to play Woodard in the field, I should only put him at second base. So one day we're playing the Indians, it's 3-2 in the eighth inning, and Wayne Gross is my third baseman. Gross is a truck, and he gets a base hit, so I put the rabbit in to run for him. I'm out of bench players, so that means I have to play Woodard in the ninth inning. When the inning starts I put him at second base and move my second baseman, Pee Wee Edwards, over to third. We get the first guy out, but then they get the next two on and bring Johnny Grubb in to pinch-hit. I go to the mound to bring in a left-hander, Bob Lacey, and while I'm out there decide to move Edwards back to second and Woodard over to third. I want to have my regular double-play combination together, hoping we can get Grubb to hit into a double play. I also don't think it's likely that Grubb will hit the ball to third. So what happens? Grubb lines Lacey's first pitch to third, Woodard jumps up and spears it, throws to second to double off the runner and the game is over. Of course, the writers ask me what was behind the move, and I tell them that I wanted a taller third baseman.

The next day, Finley sees "3B" next to Woodard's name in the box score calls up McKeon at 6 in the morning and lights into him. McKeon explains what happened. Finley listens and finally says, "So, I bet you think you're a damn genius now?!"

(By the way, McKeon's story sort of checks out but not completely. The game in question was actually against Seattle, the second game of a doubleheader. Woodard had made his debut pinch-running in the first game. In the second game, he entered as a defensive replacement in the seventh inning. Baseball-Reference lists him as entering at third base, although it's certainly possible that he only moved there in the manner McKeon described. Anyway, the batter was Danny Meyer, not Johnny Grubb, and Meyer grounded into a 5-4 double play with two runners on to end the inning. It's possible the play-by-play is wrong and that it was a line out and not a ground out. Regardless, that was the only fielding play Woodard had at third base that year. I'll give McKeon give a B+ for memory on that one, not bad considering it was nearly 30 years later after the fact.)

Things finally fell apart in August (7-21) and September (7-21). The pitching staff had a 4.45 ERA over those final two months and the batters hit .237. The A's drew just 536,999 fans that year, an average of 6,587 per game.

The city of Oakland sued Finley for $1.5 million in lost revenue over four years and $10 million in punitive damages, alleging Finley had not complied with his "obligation to endeavor in good faith to obtain maximum occupancy of the Stadium by the public by failing to reasonably promote attendance at Oakland A's baseball games."

"Charlie hasn't spent one red cent on promotion," Lacey said told Sports Illustrated. "I've played on Triple A teams that promoted more. I've never been asked to speak anywhere. The fans don't even know who we are. ... I don't care, let him punish me. He's hoping I'll have a bad year so he can give me a pay cut."

Under new manager Jim Marshall in 1979 attendance would plummet even further, to 3,787 fans per game. (The A's didn't have a radio contract or an announcer until the day before the season began that year.) Finley hired Billy Martin to manage the club in 1980 and with a dynamic young outfield of Rickey Henderson, Dwayne Murphy and Tony Armas and a pitching staff that threw 94 complete games, the A's went 83-79. In the midst of a divorce at the time, Finley finally sold the A's after the season.

In 1981, the A's made the playoffs. Henderson, drafted in 1976, was the star. Armas and pitcher Rick Langford had come over from the Pirates in the Garner trade. Langford, Matt Keough, Mike Norris and Steve McCatty, the stellar rotation that year, had all pitched for the 1978 team. A team with one strange season.



SweetSpot blogger

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1j4C89l

Source : http://ift.tt/1j4C89l

Fixed





The traditional fixed annuity - a product that credits a fixed rate of interest over a stated period of time - is heating up at broker-dealers.

For example, LPL Financial reaped some $46.7 million for the first quarter in commission revenue from fixed-annuity sales, up 70.8% from the year-earlier period, according to the broker-dealer's quarterly earnings report.

The firm attributes the jump in sales "primarily to increased sales of indexed annuities, as well as a new three-year fixed-annuity product that was introduced beginning in the fourth quarter of 2013," the company noted in a filing with the SEC last week.

The three-year fixed annuity that's making waves at LPL is widely believed to be the Forethought SecureFore 3, which is offering a guaranteed rate of 2% over the course of three years if the client chooses not to use the return-of-premium feature. The surrender charges over the three-year period are relatively high: 8% the first two years and 7% for the third. Should a client opt for the return-of-premium option, he or she can receive a 1.5% guaranteed rate instead of the 2%.

LPL spokeswoman Betsy Weinberger did not respond to a request for comment.

Two percent isn't much if you're comparing a fixed annuity to returns in the stock market, but if the annuity's used as a CD proxy, it's handily beating that option. Rates for a three-year CD are ranging from 0.35% to 1.45%, according to Bankrate.com.

"It's not a bad rate," noted Jeremy D. Alexander, president and CEO of Beacon Research. "The yield is selling it." He counted four insurers offering 2% rates: Delaware Life, Liberty Bankers Life Insurance Co. and Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Co. and Forethought Financial Group Inc. Commonwealth and Forethought are both owned by Global Atlantic Financial Group, an insurer with roots that stretch back to the Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

Last year was a banner year for fixed annuities across the board, with sales rising to $78.1 billion, up 16.6% from the prior year, according to Beacon Research. Of that amount, traditional fixed annuities without market-value adjustments accounted for $21.6 billion, up 14.85% from the year-earlier period. Market-value adjusted fixed annuities, which adjust the amount clients receive if they withdraw their money early, sold to the tune of $6.7 billion, up 41.4% from the prior year, according to Beacon. Indexed annuities accounted for $38.7 billion in sales, up 13.2% from the prior year. Income annuities sold $11.0 billion, up 19.9% from 2012.

Carrie Turcotte, president of Crest Financial Strategies, recently sold Forethought's SecureFore 3 fixed annuity to a client who kept a lot of money in CDs and would do so for years at a time. This particular client was earning less than 0.5% on the CDs. He keeps some cash on the sidelines for liquidity needs in the interim, and he now has a place to park a chunk of his money at a better rate.

The 2% rate is an attractive one at a time when insurers' low returns on bond portfolios are still affecting their ability to provide the most competitive fixed-annuity rates. "Rates [on fixed annuities] haven't been worth considering," Ms. Turcotte said.

Richard Dragotta, an adviser with LPL, said 2% isn't quite high enough for him to be interested, but noted that there's an audience out there for that product. "I'm not a proponent of locking up money for 2%, but then again it's short-term and rates aren't rising overnight," he said. "If you're in a high tax bracket, then the tax-deferred growth is even better."

Over at Raymond James Financial Inc., the top selling fixed annuity - exclusive of indexed annuities - is a product from Commonwealth Annuity and Life. This contract has maturities that range from three to 10 years, and the three-year version of the product is paying 2.25%, according to Scott Stolz, senior vice president of Raymond James' Private Client Group-Investment Products.

"It's a great place to park money and earn something on it in the interim, with the hope you can do something with it not too far down the road," Mr. Stolz said.





Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1ijV2E6

Source : http://ift.tt/1ijV2E6

AIG Reports First Quarter 2014 Net Income Attributable to AIG of $1.6 Billion ...


AIG - American International Group Inc.


AIG Reports First Quarter 2014 Net Income Attributable to AIG of $1.6 Billion and Diluted Earnings Per Share of $1.09



  • First quarter 2014 after-tax operating income attributable to AIG of $1.8 billion, $1.21 per diluted share

  • First quarter 2014 insurance pre-tax operating income of $2.7 billion

  • Share repurchases of approximately $867 million in the first quarter of 2014

  • Book value per share grew 6 percent from first quarter 2013 to $71.77; book value per share excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) grew 10 percent from first quarter 2013 to $65.49

  • $1.7 billion of cash dividends from AIG Life and Retirement in the first quarter of 2014


NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--May 5, 2014-- American International Group, Inc. (NYSE:AIG) today reported net income attributable to AIG of $1.6 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, compared to $2.2 billion for the first quarter of 2013. After-tax operating income attributable to AIG was $1.8 billion for the first quarter of 2014, compared to $2.0 billion for the prior-year quarter.


Diluted earnings per share attributable to AIG were $1.09 for the first quarter of 2014, compared to $1.49 for the first quarter of 2013. After-tax operating income per diluted share attributable to AIG was $1.21 for the first quarter of 2014, compared to $1.34 in the prior-year quarter.


"I am very pleased with AIG's solid operating profits this quarter," said Robert H. Benmosche, AIG President and Chief Executive Officer. "The earnings power of our business coupled with our customer strategy reinforce the strength of our foundation throughout our core insurance operations. I am encouraged by the positive momentum we've generated around the world, which has enabled us to become closer to, and better serve, our customers.


"These results reflect strong operating income across our insurance operations, as well as execution of our capital management strategy," Mr. Benmosche continued. "We remain diligently focused on increasing operational efficiency, managing our expenses, and investing in technology; we continue to look at ways to simplify and make our organization more efficient to ensure that we are creating a company that will thrive well into the future.


"As we look to build upon the important work we have already done, we must continue to develop and grow our company so that it is more sustainable. We have made great strides in this transformation and in showing what we are capable of as a company, but we still have work to do. Above all else, we must operate and make sound business decisions as a company whose number one priority is to understand and provide for its customers.


"We also remain fully engaged with all of our regulators, including the Federal Reserve, and will continue to work closely with them to achieve our shared goal of making AIG a better, stronger company able to withstand whatever the future brings," Mr. Benmosche concluded.


Capital and Liquidity



  • AIG shareholders' equity totaled $103.8 billion at March 31, 2014

  • Repurchased 17.4 million shares of AIG Common Stock for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $867 million in the first quarter of 2014; $537 million remaining under repurchase authorization

  • During the first quarter of 2014, AIG reduced Direct Investment book (DIB) debt by $2.2 billion through a redemption of $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of its 4.250% Notes due 2014 and a repurchase of $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of its 8.250% Notes due 2018 using cash allocated to the DIB

  • In May 2014, AIG further reduced DIB debt through a redemption of $750 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.000% Notes due 2015 using cash allocated to the DIB

  • AIG Parent liquidity sources were $15.6 billion at March 31, 2014, including $11.2 billion of cash, short-term investments, and unencumbered fixed maturity securities, compared to $17.6 billion at year-end 2013


All operating segment comparisons that follow are to the first quarter of 2013 unless otherwise noted.


AIG Property Casualty's pre-tax operating income decreased to $1.2 billion due to higher catastrophe and severe losses, unfavorable loss reserve development, and a decrease in net investment income.


The first quarter 2014 combined ratio was 101.2, a 3.9 point increase from the prior-year quarter. Catastrophe losses were $262 million, compared to $41 million in the first quarter of 2013. Including related premium adjustments, net adverse development was $162 million, compared to net favorable development of $52 million for the first quarter of 2013. This adverse development was partially offset by a reserve discount benefit of $105 million in the first quarter of 2014 related to the previously disclosed changes in U.S. pooling arrangements. The first quarter 2014 accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, was flat at 63.2, reflecting enhanced risk selection, rate increases, and continued improvement from changes in business mix, offset by higher severe losses. Severe losses for the first quarter of 2014 were $186 million compared to $60 million in the first quarter of 2013. The first quarter 2014 acquisition ratio increased by 0.2 point to 19.9, primarily due to changes in business mix. The general operating expense ratio declined 0.1 point to 14.2 primarily due to lower employee-related expenses.


Excluding the effects of foreign exchange, first quarter 2014 net premiums written increased 3 percent from the same period in the prior year, with Commercial Insurance and Consumer Insurance first quarter 2014 net premiums written growing 3 percent and 2 percent, respectively, reflecting increased net exposures in both segments. Commercial Insurance continues to focus on growing higher value lines of business and rate strengthening, while Consumer Insurance continues to focus on improving underwriting results and targeted growth through multiple distribution channels.


The Commercial Insurance combined ratio increased 5.5 points to 97.7. The first quarter 2014 accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, decreased 0.3 point to 65.1, reflecting positive results from strategic actions taken to enhance risk selection and pricing; however, severe losses in the quarter increased the accident year loss ratio by 1.7 points. The general operating expense ratio increased 1.1 points to 12.1 as investments in infrastructure were partially offset by lower employee-related expenses. In addition, general operating expenses in the first quarter of 2013 included unusually low bad debt expense.


The Consumer Insurance combined ratio increased 3.5 points to 101.9 due to higher catastrophes and individual severe losses, and lower favorable prior year development, partially offset by lower expenses. The accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, increased 0.5 point to 59.3, reflecting severe losses of $41 million primarily in personal property, which were partially offset by automobile and warranty profitability. The first quarter 2014 acquisition ratio increased 1.0 point to 25.9 due to increased sales-related expenses. The general operating expense ratio improved 1.0 point primarily due to lower employee-related expenses.


AIG Life and Retirement reported record quarterly pre-tax operating income of over $1.4 billion in the first quarter of 2014. These strong results reflect continued momentum across AIG Life and Retirement's diversified portfolio of products. Performance was driven by higher income on fee-oriented products and increased profitability from spread-based products. AIG Life and Retirement generated $7.1 billion of premiums and deposits, driving $1.3 billion in net flow improvement compared to the first quarter of 2013, and contributing to the growth in assets under management. AIG Life and Retirement's interest rate-sensitive businesses continued to benefit from disciplined pricing on new business, reduced renewal crediting rates, and the run-off of older business with relatively high crediting rates.


Net investment income for the first quarter was over $2.8 billion. The portfolio base investment yield increased to 5.32 percent, compared to 5.30 percent in the first quarter of 2013. Lower yields on new investments were more than offset by participation income on a commercial mortgage loan and redemption income received in the first quarter 2014. Net investment income also benefitted from higher returns on alternative investments in the quarter. The fair value of AIG Life and Retirement's investment in The People's Insurance Company (Group) of China Limited (PICC Group) declined by $79 million in the first quarter of 2014, compared to a $31 million increase in the prior-year quarter, which had a negative impact on net investment income.


Assets under management grew 9 percent to $324.4 billion. Increased demand for AIG Life and Retirement's products drove strong net flows of $5.8 billion over the last 12 months, contributing to the growth in assets under management. Appreciation in equity markets also resulted in an increase in assets under management in the group and individual variable annuity and mutual fund businesses. The development of AIG's stable value wrap business accounted for a $13.0 billion increase in assets under management from the prior-year period.


Premiums and deposits totaled $7.1 billion, up 28 percent from the first quarter of 2013. AIG Life and Retirement continued to maintain its disciplined approach to product pricing and design while generating substantial growth in retail investment products. Premiums and deposits for the Retirement Income Solutions and Retail Mutual Fund product lines increased 54 percent and 39 percent, respectively. Fixed Annuities product line premiums and deposits totaled $960 million for the quarter, up from $376 million in the first quarter of 2013, reflecting a higher interest rate environment in the first quarter of 2014 compared to the prior-year period.


The Retail operating segment reported quarterly pre-tax operating income of $834 million. Results were driven by higher fee income and enhanced spread income. Fixed Annuities continued to benefit from crediting rate actions on existing business, duration matching of assets and liabilities, disciplined pricing on new business, and the run-off of older business with relatively high crediting rates. Retail net investment income declined slightly, primarily attributable to the reduction in the fair value of the investment in PICC Group, which was partially offset by higher alternative investment income.


The Institutional operating segment reported quarterly pre-tax operating income of $583 million. Results were driven by operating income growth in Group Retirement attributable to increased fee income due to higher assets under management and enhanced spread income. Institutional pre-tax operating income was also impacted by a decline in the fair value of the investment in PICC Group.


In the first quarter of 2014, AIG Life and Retirement distributed $1.7 billion in cash dividends to AIG Parent, including approximately $316 million of legal settlement proceeds.


United Guaranty Corporation (UGC) reported pre-tax operating income of $76 million for the first quarter of 2014, compared to pre-tax operating income of $41 million in the prior-year quarter. Current quarter results reflect increased net premiums earned, lower incurred losses due to lower newly reported delinquencies and increased cure rates in the first-lien book of business, which were partially offset by a change in the assumption for overturn rates on previously denied claims.


Net premiums written decreased 6 percent to $231 million. First-lien new insurance written decreased 27 percent to $7.7 billion in principal of loans insured, driven by declining mortgage originations from refinancing activity. Quality remained high, with an average FICO score of 751, and an average loan-to-value of 92 percent on new business.


OTHER OPERATIONS


AIG's Other Operations (excluding Mortgage Guaranty) reported a first quarter 2014 pre-tax operating loss of $81 million compared to a pre-tax operating loss of $161 million in the prior-year first quarter. This improvement reflects lower interest expense from ongoing debt management activities and improved results from the DIB driven by asset appreciation and gains realized upon unwinding certain positions. Partially offsetting these improvements was a decline in Global Capital Markets pre-tax operating income due to declines in unrealized market valuation gains related to the super senior CDS portfolio and in net credit valuation adjustments on derivative assets and liabilities.


Conference Call


AIG will host a conference call tomorrow, Tuesday, May 6, 2014, at 8:00 a.m. EDT to review these results. The call is open to the public and can be accessed via a live listen-only webcast at www.aig.com. A replay will be available after the call at the same location.


Additional supplementary financial data is available in the Investor Information section at www.aig.com.


The conference call (including the conference call presentation material), the earnings release and the financial supplement may include projections, goals, assumptions and statements that may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These projections, goals, assumptions and statements are not historical facts but instead represent only AIG's belief regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside AIG's control. These projections, goals, assumptions and statements include statements preceded by, followed by or including words such as "believe," "anticipate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "view," "target" or "estimate." These projections, goals, assumptions and statements may address, among other things: the monetization of AIG's interests in International Lease Finance Corporation (ILFC), including whether AIG's proposed sale of ILFC will be completed and if completed, the timing and final terms of such sale; AIG's exposures to subprime mortgages, monoline insurers, the residential and commercial real estate markets, state and municipal bond issuers, and sovereign bond issuers; AIG's exposure to European governments and European financial institutions; AIG's strategy for risk management; AIG's generation of deployable capital; AIG's return on equity and earnings per share; AIG's strategies to grow net investment income, efficiently manage capital and reduce expenses; AIG's strategies for customer retention, growth, product development, market position, financial results and reserves; and the revenues and combined ratios of AIG's subsidiaries. It is possible that AIG's actual results and financial condition will differ, possibly materially, from the results and financial condition indicated in these projections, goals, assumptions and statements. Factors that could cause AIG's actual results to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific projections, goals, assumptions and statements include: changes in market conditions; the occurrence of catastrophic events, both natural and man-made; significant legal proceedings; the timing and applicable requirements of any new regulatory framework to which AIG is subject as a non-bank systemically important financial institution and as a global systemically important insurer; concentrations in AIG's investment portfolios; actions by credit rating agencies; judgments concerning casualty insurance underwriting and insurance liabilities; judgments concerning the recognition of deferred tax assets; and such other factors discussed in Part I, Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) in AIG's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014, and Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7. MD&A in AIG's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. AIG is not under any obligation (and expressly disclaims any obligation) to update or alter any projections, goals, assumptions, or other statements, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.


Comment on Regulation G


Throughout this press release, including the financial highlights, AIG presents its financial condition and results of operations in the way it believes will be most meaningful, representative and transparent. Some of the measurements AIG uses are "non-GAAP financial measures" under Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations. GAAP is the acronym for "accounting principles generally accepted in the United States." The non-GAAP financial measures AIG presents may not be comparable to similarly named measures reported by other companies. The reconciliations of such measures to the most comparable GAAP measures in accordance with Regulation G are included within the relevant tables or in the First Quarter 2014 Financial Supplement available in the Investor Information section of AIG's website, www.aig.com.


Book Value Per Common Share Excluding Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (AOCI) is used to show the amount of AIG's net worth on a per-share basis. AIG believes Book Value Per Common Share Excluding AOCI is useful to investors because it eliminates the effect of non-cash items that can fluctuate significantly from period to period, including changes in fair value of AIG's available for sale securities portfolio and foreign currency translation adjustments. Book Value Per Common Share Excluding AOCI is derived by dividing Total AIG shareholders' equity, excluding AOCI, by Total common shares outstanding.


AIG uses the following operating performance measures because it believes they enhance understanding of the underlying profitability of continuing operations and trends of AIG and its business segments. AIG believes they also allow for more meaningful comparisons with AIG's insurance competitors.


After-tax operating income (loss) attributable to AIG is derived by excluding the following items from net income (loss) attributable to AIG: income (loss) from discontinued operations, net loss (gain) on sale of divested businesses and properties, income from divested businesses, legacy tax adjustments primarily related to certain changes in uncertain tax positions and other tax adjustments, legal reserves (settlements) related to "legacy crisis matters," deferred income tax valuation allowance (releases) charges, changes in fair value of AIG Life and Retirement fixed maturity securities designated to hedge living benefit liabilities (net of interest expense), changes in benefit reserves and deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC), value of business acquired (VOBA), and sales inducement assets (SIA) related to net realized capital gains (losses), AIG Property Casualty other (income) expenses-net, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net realized capital (gains) losses, and non-qualifying derivative hedging activities, excluding net realized capital (gains) losses. "Legacy crisis matters" include favorable and unfavorable settlements related to events leading up to and resulting from AIG's September 2008 liquidity crisis and legal fees incurred by AIG as the plaintiff in connection with such legal matters. See page 12 for the reconciliation of Net income attributable to AIG to After-tax operating income attributable to AIG.


AIG Property Casualty pre-tax operating income (loss) includes both underwriting income (loss) and net investment income, but excludes net realized capital (gains) losses, other (income) expense-net, and legal settlements related to legacy crisis matters described above. Underwriting income (loss) is derived by reducing net premiums earned by claims and claims adjustment expenses incurred, acquisition expenses and general operating expenses.


AIG Property Casualty, along with most property and casualty insurance companies, uses the loss ratio, the expense ratio and the combined ratio as measures of underwriting performance. These ratios are relative measurements that describe, for every $100 of net premiums earned, the amount of claims and claims adjustment expense, and the amount of other underwriting expenses that would be incurred. A combined ratio of less than 100 indicates underwriting income and a combined ratio of over 100 indicates an underwriting loss. The underwriting environment varies across countries and products, as does the degree of litigation activity, all of which affect such ratios. In addition, investment returns, local taxes, cost of capital, regulation, product type and competition can have an effect on pricing and consequently on profitability as reflected in underwriting income and associated ratios.


Both the AIG Property Casualty Accident year loss ratio, as adjusted, and combined ratio, as adjusted, exclude catastrophe losses and related reinstatement premiums, prior-year development, net of premium adjustments, and the impact of reserve discounting. Catastrophe losses are generally weather or seismic events having a net impact on AIG Property Casualty in excess of $10 million each.


AIG Life and Retirement pre-tax operating income (loss) is derived by excluding the following items from pre-tax income (loss): legal settlements related to legacy crisis matters described above, changes in fair values of fixed maturity securities designated to hedge living benefit liabilities (net of interest expense), net realized capital (gains) losses, and changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA, and SIA related to net realized capital gains (losses).


AIG Life and Retirement premiums and deposits includes direct and assumed amounts received on traditional life insurance policies, group benefit policies and deposits on life-contingent payout annuities, as well as deposits received on universal life, investment-type annuity contracts and mutual funds.


Other Operations pre-tax operating income (loss) is derived by excluding the following items from pre-tax income (loss): certain legal reserves (settlements) related to legacy crisis matters described above, (gain) loss on extinguishment of debt, net realized capital (gains) losses, net loss (gain) on sale of divested businesses and properties, changes in benefit reserves and DAC, VOBA and SIA related to net realized capital gains (losses) and income from divested businesses, including Aircraft Leasing.


Results from discontinued operations are excluded from all of these measures.


American International Group, Inc. (AIG) is a leading international insurance organization serving customers in more than 130 countries and jurisdictions. AIG companies serve commercial, institutional, and individual customers through one of the most extensive worldwide property-casualty networks of any insurer. In addition, AIG companies are leading providers of life insurance and retirement services in the United States. AIG common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Tokyo Stock Exchange.


Additional information about AIG can be found at www.aig.com | YouTube: www.youtube.com/aig |Twitter: @AIGInsurance| LinkedIn: http://ift.tt/13Adxgv |


AIG is the marketing name for the worldwide property-casualty, life and retirement, and general insurance operations of American International Group, Inc. For additional information, please visit our website at www.aig.com. All products and services are written or provided by subsidiaries or affiliates of American International Group, Inc. Products or services may not be available in all countries, and coverage is subject to actual policy language. Non-insurance products and services may be provided by independent third parties. Certain property-casualty coverages may be provided by a surplus lines insurer. Surplus lines insurers do not generally participate in state guaranty funds, and insureds are therefore not protected by such funds.




American International Group, Inc.




Financial Highlights*




(in millions, except share data)




Three Months Ended March 31,




See accompanying notes on the following page.






Financial highlights - notes




*


Including reconciliation in accordance with Regulation G.




Represents total AIG shareholders' equity divided by common shares outstanding.




Represents total AIG shareholders' equity, excluding AOCI divided by common shares outstanding.




Source: American International Group, Inc.


Investors:

Liz Werner, 212-770-7074

elizabeth.werner@aig.com

or

Media:

Jon Diat, 212-770-3505

jon.diat@aig.com



distributed by






Source : http://ift.tt/1iW2Ono

Should you buy or sell these 2 banking icons?





Myths busted Home loans can seem a bit complicated and overwhelming. But it doesn't have to be. Mark Bouris clears up some common misconceptions.

Australia and New Zealand Banking Group (ASX: ANZ) announced another good result for the first half - despite this there are indications the underlying business isn't performing quite as well as headline numbers suggest.

1. The commercial division continues to perform sluggishly with both margins and volumes down. 2. Growing competition in residential mortgage lending crimping margins and future volume growth. 3. Previously benign impairment cycle is bottoming and may deteriorate. 4. Capital declined to 8.3%; target is 8.5% â€" 9%. Additional capital is likely to be raised by divestment of minority interests. 5. Trade finance duration is decreasing. 6. Trading profits (mainly foreign exchange) were strong in the first half and could reverse.

Joys

1. Overall loan growth up 5%. 2. Return on equity ok at 15.5%; target above 16%. 3. New Zealand very strong - expenses down 6%, revenue up 3%. 4. Asian strategy gaining traction; 19% of business in first half.

Although the first three worries are also shared by the other domestic banks, ANZ's foothold in Asia may mean it has to meet stricter capital requirements than the other majors in the medium term. If so, this will constrain the ability to increase dividends, even assuming all else is equal.

In common with Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA), National Australia Bank Ltd (ASX: NAB) and Westpac Banking Corp (ASX: WBC), ANZ has little investment appeal at current prices.

Macquarie Group Ltd (ASX: MQG) has a dynamic business model with head office essentially a capital allocator dealing with six distinct and almost autonomous business satellites. This 'grass roots' style of management coupled with very strong risk management processes has served Macquarie well over the years and enabled it to come out of the GFC era in a stronger position than most investment banks.

With 68% of the business now sourced overseas Macquarie should continue to benefit from the revitalisation of Asian, UK and North American economies as well as the expected growth in infrastructure across all economies (Macquarie is the global leader in infrastructure assets under management).

Of interest in the report was the performance of the Fixed Interest, Currencies and Commodities division. Macquarie is now the fourth-largest gas trader in the US market (the top three are industry traders). In this area Macquarie doesn't act as principal but provides hedging and trading services to clients. It also acts as a broker between buyers and sellers.

The funds management division had another good year with funds under management rising 23%. This division continues to impress as an important source of annuity style income for the whole group.

In Australia (32% of income) things have been fairly quiet, although CEO Nicholas Moore hints we could see some innovative moves in banking and financial services over coming months.

Macquarie's $30 billion in deposits funds $17billion (1% market share) of the mortgage book and further growth can be expected.

Ever the prudent entrepreneur, Macquarie Group has now established significant niche momentum in global markets and offers good buying below $65.

Foolish takeaway By nature financial services such as banks are leveraged to the economies they operate in - with the Australian economy facing much needed adjustments some disruption can be expected. This factor alone makes me very cautious about the medium-term outlook for domestically focused banks. On the other hand investment bank Macquarie Group has access to more productive economies and the benefits this brings. Attention bank shareholders!

Fact: Australia's large banks had an incredible run in 2013. But some top analysts are saying the trend could stop dead! Get the inside scoop in The Motley Fool's brand-new FREE investment report, "What Every Bank Shareholder MUST Know." More reading Motley Fool contributor Peter Andersen owns shares in Macquarie Group

The Motley Fool's purpose is to help the world invest, better. Click here now for your free subscription to Take Stock, The Motley Fool's free investing newsletter. Packed with stock ideas and investing advice, it is essential reading for anyone looking to build and grow their wealth in the years ahead. This article contains general investment advice only (under AFSL 400691). Authorised by Bruce Jackson.

Keep reading - next article

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1mw9yko

Source : http://ift.tt/1mw9yko

Expect GlaxoSmithKline's Dividend To Expand Into The 5% Range

Summary

Glaxo's recent asset swap with Novartis will change the composition of its future revenue stream. The vaccine and consumer health division will be further strengthened. The above two divisions are virtually annuity like, hence lowering GSK's overall risk profile.

The healthcare industry in my view is best classified as a dependable, recession proof industry due to the consistent demand for their end products. The industry holds particular appeal to conservative long term investors due to the stable, predictable nature of their revenue and earnings stream. The consistent revenue stream generates excess capital that tends to be returned to shareholders in the form of dividends.

GlaxoSmithKline Plc ( GSK) neatly falls into the above definition with their diverse divisions ranging from immunizations to consumer goods such as Aqua fresh toothpaste. The article below will discuss the recent asset swap conducted with Novartis ( NVS). I will also analyze how the asset swap will further strengthen GSK's ability to pay out higher dividends going forward.

The research based drug discovery companies are undergoing a revolutionary change with assets being swapped to focus on "core" franchises due to the high cost of drug development. We have seen a flurry of deals in this space, beginning with Bristol Myers Squibb (AstraZeneca ( BMY) sale of its diabetes division to its partner AZN). There are the ongoing negotiations between multiple suitors for Merck ( MRK) consumer division along with the recently announced NVS deals. NVS has divested its animal health division to Eli Lilly ( LLY) for 5.4 billion dollars along with the transformational swap of assets with GSK.

Under the terms of the deal, GSK will sell its oncology division to NVS for $14.5 billion dollars along with $1.5 billion in milestone payments. GSK will acquire NVS vaccine business excluding its flu portfolio for $5.25 billion dollars along with a milestone payment of roughly $1.8 billion dollars. NVS and GSK would then combine their consumer division into a joint venture with GSK retaining 63.5% of the combined entity.

Let's examine the above mentioned deals by NVS. NVS significantly lagged its two main competitors in the animal health space, Zoetis ( ZTS) and Elanco Animal Health a division of LLY. NVS decided to focus its resources in areas where it has a clear competitive advantage such as oncology, thus necessitating the sale of this division. In the vaccine field, GSK is a clear leader with a strong slate of current vaccines along with significant potential assets in various phases of clinical trials. An assets swap would allow each company to focus on their particular field of expertise, further strengthening their "franchise". The question left for a current GSK investor is how will the company change now that the asset swaps have been agreed to?

In their most recent annual report, GSK breaks down their sales into three divisions dubbed pharmaceuticals, vaccines and consumer health. I would like to begin with the vaccine division which constitutes 13% of GSK total sales. Sir Andrew Witty CEO of GSK has dubbed vaccines in general as an annuity type business with long term prospects. The following video interview courtesy of CNBC neatly sums up his thoughts. I encourage all to take the time and watch this short clip, it is quite informative. Demand for vaccines tends to be stable and rather predictable, which allows for accurate modeling of demand and sales. Due to the predictable, steady nature of vaccine sales, the division exhibits annuity type characteristics. The division has some growth potential outside the merger as NVS acquired meningitis B vaccine Bexsero has been granted breakthrough therapy designation by the FDA.

The consumer health division registered sales of over $8 billion dollars, which accounted for 20% of GSK's total sales for 2013. The addition of NVS consumer unit which registered sales of roughly $4 billion dollars, should help make the combined entity a force to be reckoned with in the consumer health. NVS portfolio neatly fills in the gaps in GSK portfolio with well known brands such as Excedrin, Lamisil, Benefiber and Otrivin. Product overlap is absent in the combined entity, so cannibalization of sales shouldn't be an immediate worry. The strengthening of the combined entity will allow for greater leverage with retailers. I view the consumer health division as an annuity type business as well. I estimate at minimum, 35% of GSK annual revenue will consist of predictable annuity like divisions. That leaves the largest revenue generator being the pharmaceutical division which I will detail below.

The pharmaceutical division's largest revenue generator continues to be the respiratory franchise, which makes up roughly 40% of sales. GSK flagship product continues to be Advair, a combination of an inhaled steroid with a long acting beta agonists in a powder form, delivered via a unique delivery device termed the diskus. I mention all this due to the fact that its unique delivery mechanism has isolated it from generic competition. The FDA has failed to issue guideline to potential generic manufacturers. The continued delay has given management confidence that a generic competitor won't emerge before 2016. In the interim, the delay will give GSK ample opportunity to market its two new remedies dubbed Breo and Anoro which will be delivered via the unique delivery device known as Ellipta. The initial demand for Breo has been delayed due to poor coverage via Medicare part D coverage. The CEO acknowledged this during the recent conference call.

"With the launch of Breo though it's given us obviously the opportunity to get in and start to negotiate those contracts. And I'm delighted that as of today, we now have 70% coverage in Medicare Part D for Breo. That compares to only 3% on January the 1st, very substantial improvement. I expect the sales for Breo will begin to trend up as the product gains coverage and prescribers begin to use the product on their patients. Anoro was just recently launched with much better coverage than Breo began with. "Anoro was launched last week. Its anecdotal feedback is extremely good, very promising. And I'm also delighted that we've already been able to secure the first of our Medicare Part D contracts. That clearly is very significant contrast to the Breo situation. I think it reflects a more convenient timing for launch in terms of the calendar of contract negotiations and also of course reflects the fact that Anoro was a first-in-class new product into the US.

I anticipate the sales expected from Breo and Anoro will help offset the decline in sales that can be expected once Advair faces generic competition. I expect future revenue growth to be fueled by new pharmaceutical products such as Tivicay for HIV and Tanzeum for diabetes along with price increases from the vaccine and consumer health divisions. The following quote sums up management's expectations for earnings per share growth for 2014.

"EPS guidance remains unchanged at 4% to 8% for the year. We expect to grow sales little less clear exactly the rate of sales growth given some of the dynamics that we're seeing open up during the year particularly the early approval of Lovaza combined with some of the price pressure we're seeing in the US. Nonetheless, we feel confident to deliver sales growth and very confident to deliver an EPS within the range of 4% to 8%. 2014 Dividends$0.75 2013 Dividends$2.41 2012 Dividends$2.48 2011 Dividends$2.21 2010 Dividends$2.00 2009 Dividends$1.85 2008 Dividends$2.14 (click to enlarge)



GSK data by YCharts

As we can see from the table above, GSK has managed to raise its dividend in a rather uneven fashion since 2008. The dividend was lowered quite a bit in 2009 due to patent expirations and currency fluctuations. Since that time, GSK has amply rewarded shareholders as we can see from the table above. The actual dividend payment has gone up over the last 3 quarters as compared to the same quarter the year before. GSK has been returning a greater percentage of earnings to shareholders, which further add to the appeal of the shares. Once the proposed asset swap with NVS is completed in 2015, I expect GSK earnings to be further strengthened, allowing for the continued upward trajectory in the dividend received. By increasing the percentage of revenue from more stable sources such as vaccines and consumer health will allow GSK to distribute dividends in a more predictable manner.

In a move that may add to the available funds to be paid out to shareholders via dividends, is the announcement by GSK to return roughly $6.7 billion via the repurchase of shares outstanding once the deal is consummated in 2015. By reducing the shares outstanding, the funds earmarked for dividends will be allocated to a smaller share base leading to a higher amount received per share. GSK has proven itself to be a shareholder friendly company, hence the risk of the above scenario not playing out is rather minimal. I continue to remain long in GSK, and I am quite content to reinvest the dividend once received. Thanks for reading and I look forward to your comments.

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1q7KPo2

Source : http://ift.tt/1q7KPo2

Will End





Getty Images For aging baby boomers, long-term care and home health care are huge concerns, and these concerns form the last part in a series of articles covering what I call the "six circles of wealth." These six circles break down your personal finance and wealth creation efforts. The goal is to have all of the circles spin at the same time, creating synergy and powerful momentum for your money.

Very few of my clients have all the circles covered, which means your wealth will take longer to grow and be open to much more risk than is necessary. So far, I have covered the first four: income and cash flow, investments, guaranteed income and cash and liquidity. This article discusses the last two: long-term care and your estate.

The only circle that can cannibalize the others is long-term care. It is also the circle that is most neglected, and most people's plan for dealing with it is hope and prayer. Most people say "I won't get that bad where I need a facility or a nurse to come in and help me" or "my family will help me with all of my needs" and even "if I get that bad, just pull the plug or shoot me and put me out of my misery." Do any of these sound familiar?

Long-term care facilities average $7,200 a month, and according to Genworth Financial, costs are increasing more than 4 percent a year. How long could your nest egg last paying out more than $80,000 per year in today's dollars? Many people might consider buying a long-term care insurance policy. The American Association of Long-Term Care Insurance says a policy for a 55-year-old costs $723 to $1,590 a year, depending upon benefits -- and these figures are from 2009. As with most insurance, if you never need it, your family will not get your premiums back after you pass away. Asset Reduction Via Estate Planning

One alternative is estate planning, which needs to be done with a quality legal firm that specializes in estate planning and elder law. There are ways to structure your estate that will lessen any blow that you might incur from the cost of long-term care. These usually involve getting rid of assets via gifts and trusts -- years before you need long-term care -- so when you have to sell off assets before Medicare kicks in its contribution for long-term care, you don't have many assets left to sell.

This type of planning is controversial because it is seen as pushing the tab on the government even if you have the ability to pay for yourself. So unless you were smart enough to have a quality life insurance product that you bought many years ago, you could be leave nothing behind for your family. Since the traditional financial world tells us to buy term insurance and not whole life, most people will stop paying for expensive term policies as they age because the cost becomes prohibitive. Thus when they are faced with long-term care issues, they must cannibalize their estate or reduce the estate before they have need long-term care. My job isn't to pass judgment but to pass along the information and let your conscience be your guide. Asset-Based Long-Term Care

Another alternative is to allocate some of your funds into products that are built to help you with the cost of long-term care. Asset-based long-term care might be as simple as putting some of your money inside of a properly structured annuity. Let's say you spend $150,000 on a long-term care annuity where you were credited with a 3-1 benefit ratio. Your $150,000 buys you $450,000 of long-term care protection if and when you need the coverage.

What if you never need the coverage and pass away at home in your bed? Then the $150,000 in that account will be part of your estate and given to your family, plus a small rate of growth. Maybe only 3 percent growth, but remember you are not doing this for growth. You have other circles of wealth that are concerned with growth and returns. This is a long-term care and estate planning strategy. You sleep well at night and maintain control of your cash, and if you never need the benefit, your family receives the money plus growth. Whole Life Insurance

Many of our clients in their 40s, 50s and even into their 60s also set up a high-quality whole life insurance policy. This provides the estate guarantee they want for their kids and grandkids so if they need to sell off assets to pay for care, they still leave behind their legacy for their family.

One of my favorite books is by Harvey Mackay is called "Dig Your Well Before You're Thirsty." These words are even truer when dealing with long term care and your legacy. John Jamieson is the best-selling author of "The Perpetual Wealth System." Check out his new Video of the Week.

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1sbidru

Source : http://ift.tt/1sbidru

NO DETROIT BANKRUPTCY DEAL! MAY DAY MARCHERS BLOCK DETROIT ...


Marchers demand no sell-out by unions, pension systems in secret talks


By Diane Bukowski May 2, 2014

DETROIT - As "retiree groups" allegedly began caving in to a Detroit bankruptcy deal, thousands of marchers, largely city retirees, blocked traffic downtown and invaded the corridors of Chase Bank and Emergency Manager Kevyn Orr's residence May 1. They chanted, "No Pensions, No Peace," "Show Orr the Door," and called on retirees to VOTE NO on any deal.


"May Day! May Day!" cried city retiree Ezza Brandon, who co-chaired a kick-off rally at Hart Plaza with Abayomi Azikiwe of the Moratorium NOW! Coalition.


"What happened to our rights under the state Constitution?" Brandon asked. "They want retirees to take pension cuts of 4.5 percent, then go back 10 years for another 28 to 29 percent from our annuities, while the banks get 75 to 100 cents on the dollar. Their wasteful spending on consultants is only eclipsed by their brutal attacks on our seniors. Vote NO on the Plan of Adjustment!"


Protester Jan Kruszewski said, "[Detroit creditor] UBS has been found guilty of $1.5 billion worth of municipal fraud, along with many other banks. They should be thrown in jail, not bailed out." Another speaker pointed out that Vietnam recently sentenced criminal bankers to death.


The marchers, representing a broad spectrum of grass-roots and national community, legal and religious groups, started the day with an "Ecumenical Unity Breakfast" at UAW Local 600's Dearborn headquarters, then caravanned downtown to Hart Plaza.


CalPERS, Nat'l Retirement Conference sue to support Detroit retirees

The same day, the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), the world's largest pension system, and The National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems filed scathing critiques of U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes' eligibility decision in the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.


Their amicus briefs, supporting appeals by Detroit's retirement systems and unions, said Rhodes' ruling essentially makes Chapter 9 bankruptcy illegal under the U.S. Constitution, and called for its immediate reversal. The suits constituted the first concrete, substantial national showing of support for Detroiters under attack.


If unions and "retiree groups" participating in ongoing secret mediation sessions on the Detroit bankruptcy agree to a deal, they would have to withdraw the Sixth Circuit appeals and forego that support. They would also have to deny that the Michigan Constitution firmly guarantees public employee pensions under Article 9, Sec. 24, a key issue in the amicus filings. (More on these briefs at conclusion of this story.)


Meanwhile, U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh is hearing a class action suit challenging the constitutionality of Public Act 436, the Emergency Manager law which was used to declare Detroit bankrupt. (See separate story to come.)


Hart Plaza rally - "Detroit is Ground Zero"

"We have the right to democratic and constitutional rule, and to have our unions protected," Detroit City Councilwoman Emeritus JoAnn Watson told the Hart Plaza rally. "Our children are being assaulted under EM rule, even though 2.3 million Michigan residents voted NO to emergency managers."


Elena Herrada, a Detroit School Board member in exile while EM Jack Martin runs the Detroit Public Schools, said Mayor Mike Duggan plans to snatch DPS up under his rule.


"Evict Kevyn Orr from OUR building, the Coleman A. Young Center," Jerry Cullens of Detroit Eviction Defense (DED) demanded. He said he joined DED when they mobilized dozens against the police to stop the eviction of his family from their home, one of tens of thousands of evictions which have devastated Detroit and suburban neighborhoods.


Cecily McClellan of the Detroit Concerned Citizens and Retirees was forced to retire when the city shut down its Human Services, Health and Workforce Development Departments, all nearly 100 percent federally funded.


"Detroit is Ground Zero in this national attack orchestrated by the Koch Brothers and ALEC," McClellan said."It's based on divide and conquer, just like the whole country was, because Detroit is mostly Black. The retirement systems are worth $6 billion that they want so they can skim their money off the top. It's about a wealth transfer by the super ungodly rich."


ALEC is the powerful, corporate-funded American Legislative Exchange Council, which holds secret meetings involving corporations and state legislators who draft 'model bills' to benefit corporate profits at public expense.


Boycott churches if they don't join fight to save Detroit

Rev. Ed Rowe of Central United Methodist Church fired up the crowd, striding back and forth as he declared, "I don't live in a bankrupt city; I live in a city that is run by a morally, spiritually and physically bankrupt system."


He called on protesters to get their ministers and pastors to throw the full weight of their churches against the assault on Detroit, or to cease attending and funding those churches.


Representing Detroit youth, Demeeko Williams of Detroiters Resisting Emergency Management (D-REM), said, "They want to take away our rights and jobs and throw us in prison. We've got to take our city back! Take back Belle Isle!"


Since EM Orr gave the State of Michigan an open-ended, unpaid "lease" on the island in February, state troopers have shown an increasingly aggressive presence there. The arrests of over 200 largely Black males so far have been reported. Meanwhile, a huge blue State Police prisoner bus stands in the parking lot of the island's casino.


A representative also spoke on behalf of undocumented workers in Detroit, who daily face mass deportations facilitated by police, sheriffs and the U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) division.


Marchers block streets, occupy Chase Bank, Orr's home at Book Cadillac

A well-orchestrated campaign of civil disobedience then took off. (See photo at top of story.)


Protesters moved out onto Jefferson Avenue, spreading their banners and signs across its entire southern width. Although one Detroit police officer tried to get a driver to run down a marcher, law enforcement eventually backed off and re-routed incoming traffic from the John Lodge freeway.


"Ain't no confusion, pensions are in the constitution," marchers chanted. "Hey Judge Rhodes, our rights won't be sold. Bail out Detroit, not the banks!"


The blockade continued for half an hour as police sirens wailed. Then marchers turned down Woodward, blocking that street as they headed for Chase Bank's Detroit headquarters. Without pause, they invaded the broad marble lobby of the bank, carrying their banners and picket signs and loudly chanting.


Eventually, the entire lobby was filled with demonstrators as bank security guards locked doors into the teller area and stood back, unsure what to do.


The street blockaders then took off down Fort to the Westin Book-Cadillac hotel at Washington Blvd. Here EM Kevyn Orr lives in a luxury suite paid for by Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, while selling off and privatizing Detroit assets including the Detroit Water and Sewerage, Public Works, and Public Lighting Departments, the Detroit Institute of Arts, and Belle Isle.


Here and in the city's own offices, Orr consults with the partners of Jones Day, his allegedly "former" law firm which along with Miller Canfield, Ernst & Young, Conway McMenzie and /Stiffel have presented themselves as the legal representatives of the City of Detroit in bankruptcy proceedings.


Marchers crowded outside, then proceeded straight through the doors of the hotel, packing the entire circular lobby with signs raised, chanting "Not one penny, not one dime, stealing pensions is a crime!" and "No more Orr-show him the door!"


Despite some shoving by hotel security, no one was arrested, and the crowd emerged triumphant at the end.


"Dan Gilbert-shame on you! Housing is a right!"

The blockade proceeded down Washington Blvd. to Capitol Park, which billionaire racist Dan Gilbert, owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers, the Greektown Casino, and swaths of downtown Detroit property, is seeking to turn into a residential and playground area for well-to-do whites.


Developers associated with Gilbert are evicting over 180 senior, disabled and largely Black Section 8 residents of the Griswold Apartments, many of whom have lived there for up to 30 years in beautiful large apartments with stunning views of downtown Detroit.


Gilbert infamously excoriated Miami Heat basketball star LeBron James for leaving the Cavaliers, comments which many civil rights leaders took as plantation-owner treatment of Cavaliers basketball players.


Ironically, Gilbert has since condemned L.A. Clippers owner Donald Sterling for his recent similarly racist rant. In a statement, Gilbert's office said, "The diverse staff members of the Cleveland Cavaliers franchise are unified in encouraging commissioner Silver and the NBA to respond with swift and appropriate action consistent with a strong zero tolerance approach to this type of reprehensible behavior."


VOD earlier raised complaints about picture window sized ads for "The Albert," the new name for the complex, which depicted all white residents and patrons, a violation of the U.S. Fair Housing Act. Ironically, the developers have redone the ads to show multi-racial residents, at the same time they are forcing multi-racial long-time tenants out.


Griswold Apartments, LLC, the alleged developer, received a 10-year tax break from the Detroit City Council last November after Ted Phillips of the United Community Housing Coalition assured the Council that his group would find other non-downtown placements for the tenants.


As they passed the Griswold Apartments, marchers chanted, "Shut down Capitol Park, shut down GM! May Day every day! Occupy the USA!"


Marchers then took Shelby to Fort Street to block traffic outside the Federal Courthouse on W. Lafayette where bankruptcy proceedings are being held, for an extended period of time.


The marchers spread across the street while police, taken off guard by the winding nature of the march, rushed cruisers and mounted cops over to the scene, seeking to block the demonstrators' exit at the west end of Fort.However, the march adroitly snaked through an opening and re-took the streets, proceeding back to Woodward Ave.


Back down Woodward to rally at Hazen Pingree statue

The marchers resumed their journey to Woodward Avenue, where their full numbers could be seen. Black, white, young, old, babies, seniors, retirees and their supporters, they demanded to know, "Land of the Free? Where's our democracy?" and "Make the Banks Pay!"


They appropriately concluded their downtown occupation at the feet of the statue of former Detroit Mayor Hazen Pingree, which bears a plaque calling him the "people's mayor." It says, "He was the first to warn the people of the great danger threatened by private corporations."


After the 1891 "Trolley Car Riot," Pingree helped establish the public sector in Detroit, including the Detroit Street Railways (DSR), meant to be just that, the Public Lighting Department, originally meant to power all city residences, and Detroit Receiving Hospital, which remained public until it was taken over in 1980 by the Detroit Medical Center. With current Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan at the helm of the DMC, it became part of a for-profit hedge-funded corporation.


The Rev. Charles Williams, Michigan coordinator of the National Action Network, addressed the group, among others.


"Fifty years ago, your people and activists from across the country left their homes to fight for voting rights in the South," Williams recalled. "But here we are 50 years later still fighting to protect the voting rights of people in Michigan and in Detroit. We are going to continue to protest and march in the spirit of civil disobedience, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., SNCC and the SCLC. You ain't seen nothing yet!"


Undefatigable activist Monica Lewis Patrick said, "This is all about you and your children, to make sure that they have pensions too. Don't give in to the tyranny of austerity. The financial crisis was manufactured by the banks. Most of you have been on the front lines for a long time, resisting, unifying, fighting back. Don't you back up! This is the beginning, not the end. We still have not put all our feet on the ground. Go out in the neighborhoods, talk to your families, your friends and your neighbors. Many of them don't know, and they don't know that they don't know."


Some groups who organized march with contact info and meeting times: Moratorium NOW! and Stop the Theft of Our Pensions: Phone: 313-680-5508 Detroit Concerned Citizens and Retirees: Phone 313-444-0061; Meets Mondays at 11 a.m. at N'namdi's, 12511 Woodward Ave. Highland Park, MI National Action Network, Detroit Chapter: http://ift.tt/1idVUhD Meets every Saturday at 10 a.m. at Historic King Solomon Baptist Church, 6100 14th St, Detroit, MI 48208. (313) 355-2150 Detroit Eviction Defense:Uniting Detroiters: http://ift.tt/1idVVSL Michigan Welfare Rights Organization: www.mwro.org NAT'L RETIREMENT SYSTEMS BLAST JUDGE RHODES' RULINGS, FILE SUIT IN SIXTH CIRCUIT TO SUPPORT DETROITERS Retirement systems say Rhodes ruling would make Chapter 9 itself unconstitutional Rush to bankruptcy exit must be opposed by Detroit unions, retiree groups as national support grows By Diane Bukowski May 2, 2013 Click on DB 6th CalPERS ab 2.CV01 and DB 6th ab Natl Conf PERS_3 compressed to read complete briefs from CalPERS, NCPERS Ask for Eviction Defense at (313) 429-5009 http://ift.tt/RltOH3 Meets every Thursday, 6 p.m. Old St John's Church, 2120 Russell near Eastern Market Detroit Meets every Monday night at 7 p.m. at 5920 Second Avenue, Detroit, MI

DETROIT - Representing the first national support of substance for Detroit retirees and residents, the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS), and The National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems filed amicus briefs May 1 in the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court to support Detroit retirees and residents in their battle against bankruptcy and pension theft.


Michigan's state constitutional protection of public employee pensions is central to the arguments of both groups in demanding reversal of U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes' ruling that Detroit is eligible for Chapter 9 bankruptcy and can cut pensions.


"The California Public Employees' Retirement System ("CalPERS") is the largest State-run pension system in the United States, and one of the largest sovereign pension funds in the world. . . ." says CalPERS in its 64-page brief. "It currently administers the pensions for nearly 1.7 million current and former public employees, who are drawn from over 3000 California public employers. It has been involved in at least five chapter 9 bankruptcies in California, and is currently involved in the second and third largest municipal bankruptcies in United States history-the cities of Stockton and San Bernardino."


CalPERS, through its attorneys from K & L Gates, LLP, said that Rhodes' decision, which authorized state officials to raid Detroit pensions, " . . . .was the first of its kind, determining that a municipality can impair the rights of a public pension system in bankruptcy despite express State law prohibitions to the contrary."


It notes that Rhodes' ruling is relevant to all public pension systems nationally because it "can be misconstrued for the broad proposition that all pensions are subject to impairment under Chapter 9." At least 24 states have provisions protecting public pensions.


The CalPERS suit says Section 903 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code "expressly preserves a State's laws governing its creatures [i.e. municipalities] notwithstanding the filing of a chapter 9 petition. . . .the court misconstrued the Tenth Amendment and the limitations it places on a State's ability to "consent" to violations of State laws and constitutional provisions."


It says Rhodes' interpretation of Section 903 would make the very existence of Chapter 9 federally unconstitutional.


"In essence, the bankruptcy court decided a constitutional question, not because it was unavoidable, but because it believed that putting the issue behind it would facilitate negotiations and the administration of the case. This was not appropriate," said CalPERS.


The brief also questioned whether the Detroit's "good faith" requirements were met in filing bankruptcy. " . . . . the eligibility requirements, including good faith, must have real meaning and force," CalPERS asserts.


It says further, "Congress envisioned that municipal debtors would come to bankruptcy with clean hands by expressly including a good faith filing requirement. Here, despite the fact that the bankruptcy court acknowledged there is "some substantial truth" in the claim that the City did not file in good faith . . . .it nonetheless concluded that the objectors had not overcome the extra-statutory "strong presumption" of a good faith filing. Exactly what the result would have been had the court not improperly injected its own notions of Congress's purposes into the analysis is unknown, but this Court [i.e. the Sixth Circuit] should review this finding with a 'jaded eye.'"


Opponents of the bankruptcy have argued that the Jones Day law firm and others planned the raid on the city's pension systems as early as 2011, using Chapter 9 to circumvent state law. Detroit EM Kevyn Orr himself boasted, "Federal law trumps state law." His "former" law firm, Jones Day, authored a "white paper" in 2011 laying out its plan for using Chapter 9 to attack public pensions, and has since gone on to use that plan to effect a takeover of Puerto Rico's systems.


Judge Rhodes himself chaired a one-sided forum on Chapter 9 and Emergency Managers on Oct. 10, 2012, which included proponents of emergency manager rule as well as a chief witness for EM Kevyn Orr in the bankruptcy case. He did not disclose his participation. When challenged, he refused to recuse himself because of it.


The brief notes that municipalities are not merely "creatures of the state," as Orr and his advisors contend ad nauseum, but that individuals residing in municipalities are protected by the Tenth Amendment as well.


"Because federalism's protections are not designed solely to protect the States alone, those rights cannot be consented away by the State," CalPERS says. "How can a State give something away that it does not solely possess? The answer is: It cannot. It is far too simplistic to say that Michigan, or any other State, by authorizing one of its creatures to file for chapter 9, consented away the enforcement of State statutory and constitutional law protecting individuals to benefit a single, financially distressed municipality."


The National Conference on Public Employment Retirement Systems (NCPERS), with the Texas Association of Public Retiree Employment Systems, filed the second brief of 19 pages through Tarcza & Associates, based in New Orleans, LA.


In addition to points made in the CalPERS brief, it condemns the use of an unelected emergency manager, and cites the vital importance of public retiree pensions to the health of state and national economies, as well as to that of the stock market.


"In this particular case, the bankruptcy court has given unprecedented power to an un-elected government official, the Emergency Manager for the City of Detroit," says the NCPERS brief. "When Michigan voters inserted Article IX, Sec. 24 into their constitution, they could not in their wildest dreams have imaged than an un-elected government official could use the federal bankruptcy process to override the will of the people."



The brief goes on, "According to the United States Census Bureau, there are more than twenty million working and retired state and local government employees in the United States. Retired public employees live in virtually every city and town in the nation. Nationally, state and local pensions support 2.9 million jobs and $443 billion in economic activity. In Michigan alone, 301,626 residents received $5.9 billion in pension benefits from state and local plans in 2009."


NCPERS says that public pension plans hold "more than $3 trillion in assets."


"These payments . . . .provide a robust economic stimulus to local economies throughout the nation . . . .In Michigan, it is estimated that the economic impact of state and local pensions accounted for 72,000 jobs and contr200ibuted $9.2 billion to the state economy in 2009. . . .Likewise, the assets of these plans are an important source of liquidity and stability for the nation's financial markets. . . .Public pension plans account for over 1/6 of the ownership of the U.S. stock market. Creating instability within these funds would have a ripple effect on the entire U.S. economy."





Source : http://ift.tt/RltQ1A

The myth of power





Recently, my friend and colleague, Steve Chandler, leader of the Wealth Warrior movement, was asked about engaging with a "powerful" prospect. The advice Steve gave is the same I give my professional clients when they're afraid to go after the whales in their target markets. Sometimes my clients tell themselves they have nothing to offer such wealthy, influential people. They use the excuse that the biggest fish are probably already taken care of.

Here is my adaptation of Steve's response, as it pertains to financial and insurance professionals:

are powerful, my friend. People would not be paying you fees and entrusting their financial futures to you if you weren't. Your power is not in question. I would question whether they are as powerful as you think. Why do you assign them power? Because of past income? Years of experience? Notoriety?

Can they call forth checks when someone is disabled or dies? Can they match your ability to understand and keep your eye on the financial markets? Can they think on their own of legal ways to minimize their taxes?

Powerful people, whales or elephants are stories made up by you. They're cardboard cutouts of your prospect which you have placed between you and him, making it more difficult to connect with the real person who may very much need your advice.

No one is really powerful (in the intimidating way you think they are). So focus on the work you do best and the serviceyou can give anyone, even these powerful individuals. Remember your value, and stay with that. Don't get lost in a comparison of who is more successful or prestigious. Just keep being a person-a powerful person-helping another. Sign up for The Lead and in your inbox every day! More tips:

Sandy Schussel is a speaker, business trainer and coach who helps sales teams develop systems to win clients. He is the author of The High Diving Board and Become a Client Magnet. For more information, go to http://ift.tt/1rViDAp.

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1fLQMm9

Source : http://ift.tt/1rViFrR

Pay off debt or focus on retirement?

By Pam DumonceauSpecial to The Denver Post

Posted: 05/05/2014 12:01:00 AM MDT The situation





Many people dream of having their own business, but the reality of self-employment has many advantages and disadvantages. This week, we look at the case of a couple seeking guidance on prioritizing their spending and retirement savings.

Mark, 52, and Brenda, 49, have differing opinions when it comes to retirement. The couple owns a remodeling business that was booming for several years. With the downturn in the building industry over the past few years they have seen a significant change in their net income.

One option they have discussed is using their cash and remaining credit to take on a few "fix and flip" houses with hopes of selling them for a profit quickly.

In 2005, when business was exceptionally good, the couple put $200,000 into a variable annuity, and the current value is $228,000. In addition to the variable annuity, they placed $200,000 in a mutual fund company but have had to use these assets to supplement the shortfall in their current income. This account is currently valued at $21,328. Recommendations

Mark and Brenda have two young daughters, 8 and 12, and both girls have UTMA ( Uniform Transfers to Minors Act) accounts. These accounts are valued at $26,416 and $13,533.

Brenda is convinced that paying off their debt should be their main focus, whereas Mark is more concerned with having a solid retirement plan in place. This disagreement has resulted in the couple doing neither. Ideally they would like to be able to fund both children's college education but wisely want to make sure they are financially secure for retirement first.

The decision to purchase homes to "fix and flip" is a risk that Mark and Brenda will need to evaluate as a couple. The likelihood of success is not something that we can predict.

Fortunately, the couple has some savings and good credit they can use to fund this project. If Mark and Brenda choose to liquidate the 9-year-old annuity, valued at $228,000, $28,000 will be added to their taxable income. This amount will be taxed at the couple's normal income bracket plus subject to a 10 percent penalty because neither party is 59½.

Their cash is not earning the couple anything, but it is very important that they keep an emergency fund of six to 12 months of expenses. This will help substantially in the event of a hiccup in income.

Brenda and Mark also have $26,000 in carry-forward capital losses on previous investments. Should they choose to purchase and "flip" homes, they will be able to offset the capital gains taxes with these loses.

I recommend identifying a reasonable compromise in paying off the debt and still investing for retirement. To achieve their retirement income goal of $7,000 per month, adjusted for inflation until Mark is age 95, they will need to invest a minimum of $30,000 per year. Their ideal goal is $10,000 per month in retirement. They will need to invest $72,000 per year. I recommend setting an investment goal anywhere between $30,000 and $72,000 to provide optimal retirement.

The debt is not going to disappear. I recommended Mark and Brenda consider using the cash value of life insurance on both girls which is about equal to the personal debt owed. Once they have paid this off, they can continue to work down their business debt. Pam Dumonceau has 21 years of experience in the financial planning industry. What's the Plan is not a substitute for financial planning or dedicated professional advice.

In regards to the girls' UTMA accounts, rolling these into 529 college savings account may be the best option. The 529 accounts receive tax-free growth and tax-free distributions if used for higher education. These accounts allow Mark and Brenda to have more parental control over how this money is used by their children in the future.

The couple is wise in ranking their retirement goals as a higher priority than fully funding college for their daughters. If they would like to continue to contribute to the newly opened 529 accounts, they will need to invest $750 per month for their oldest daughter and $550 for their youngest. These numbers are based on a four-year in-state college.

What's your plan? Ask Pam what you should do - e-mail whatstheplan@consistentvalues.com to get advice. Names and identifying information are changed to protect confidentiality

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1lQIdGA

Source : http://ift.tt/1lQIdGA