TDFs gaining popularity among women, young workers



Target Date Funds and other asset allocation strategies are growing in popularity with investors in employer-sponsored defined contribution retirement plans, especially with women and younger workers, according to data tracked by MassMutual's Retirement Services Division.

First-quarter 2014 data for 401(k) and other defined contribution plans administered by MassMutual show that 26.9 percent of assets were invested in asset allocation accounts, the highest ever tracked by the retirement plan provider. MassMutual serves more than 2.8 million retirement plan participants. View gallery

The investments earmarked toward asset allocation accounts have increased by 39 percent since 2009, an indication that target date funds and similar strategies are gaining traction, according to Elaine Sarsynski, executive vice president of MassMutual's Retirement Services Division. Target Date Funds, also known as age-based or lifecycle funds, automatically reallocate their mix of investments as investors get closer to a predetermined retirement date, typically growing progressively more conservative.

'MassMutual is seeing greater acceptance of asset allocation strategies for retirement planning, especially by women and younger workers,' said Sarsynski. 'We attribute the growth in popularity to more employers offering target date funds to meet a growing demand. American workers are opting for retirement savings strategies that are simpler to understand, easier to manage, and reflect their changing needs as they approach retirement.'

MassMutual observes a difference in the acceptance of asset allocation strategies by gender and generation.

In the first quarter, 28.4 percent of women's assets were allocated to asset allocation accounts as opposed to 27.7 percent by men. Those allocations have increased in the past five years by 42 percent for women and 38 percent for men.

Generation Y or millennials - those between the ages of 20 and 37 - are gravitating to target date funds and other asset allocation strategies in greater numbers, more so than Gen X (ages 36-48), baby boomers (ages 49-68) or the Silent Generation (age 69 and older). A total of 52.1 percent of Gen Y retirement assets were in asset allocation accounts in the first quarter, an increase of 3.3 percent from the same time a year ago. See also:

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/QL226d

Source : http://ift.tt/QL226d

Why Early Retirement Seminars Are Scams

Retirement savings for various periods with squirrel and nut analogy (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Back in the 1990s, when the stock market was roaring, the concept of early retirement was all the rage. I was even asked to write a book on it.

But then the dot-com bubble burst, two recessions and two needless wars came along - snuffing out that idea in a big way.

Yet there are still seminars out there that promote this idea. For super savers and those with low- or no debt, this is still possible. But for most people, it's not. Here's what's being promoted:

* Anyone Can Retire Early. While I agree with this in principle, this means having almost no short- or long-term debt, sufficient savings and the ability to keep up with inflation in your portfolio. Yet people consistently underestimate what it takes to do this and scam operators prey upon their ignorance.

First, just do the math. Let's say you want to have a retirement income of $58,000 a year. Did you know that you'd need a nest egg of at least $1.6 million to produce that income? And you still need to pay taxes and cover your health insurance and other basic expenses.

* You Can Earn High Returns. There is absolutely no exception to the rule that in order to reap higher returns, you need to take more risk. Millions have gotten suckered into high-risk structured products, annuities and unlisted real estate investment trusts. There is never a free lunch in the investment business.

Even if a broker promises a high return, you can rest assured that you will be paying dearly for it in terms of high commissions and annual fees. Here's a warning from FINRA, the self-regulator of the securities industry:

'First of all, no one can predict what an investment will do from one year to the next-and even if an investment performed well in the past, this is no guarantee it will do so in the future. Second, any return over 10.4 percent exceeds the historical long-term returns for the stock market (assuming all dividends were reinvested rather than spent), and greatly exceeds long-term returns for less risky investments such as bonds, for which the average annual return over the long term is less than 6 percent. Finally, the stock market is inherently volatile-it goes up, and it goes down. Over the past 80 years, there have been many short term periods that produced returns well below the historical average of 10.4 percent.'

* No Broker Will Tell You About Out-of-Pocket Costs. Before you qualify for Medicare, unless you have a company-provided healthcare plan, you will pay dearly for out-of-pocket medical expenses.

For example, what do you think the average out-of-pocket cost for drugs is in retirement? It's more than $235,000. You can, of course, buy Medicare supplement insurance - when you qualify for the program at 65 - or a health plan that includes drugs, but you'll pay much higher premiums than basic policies.

* Taxes Will Be a Huge Factor. Keep in mind that any money you take from a retirement plan is taxable - except for Roth IRA and Roth 401(k) plans. Early retirees, at least those withdrawing money before age 59 1/2, are subject to an additional 10-percent penalty from the IRS.

The IRS gives you a break on the early-withdrawal penalty if you take 'substantially equal periodic payments,' also known as the '72(t) rule.' But you'll still pay income tax on all non-Roth withdrawals.

* Annuities Could Help, But are Misunderstood and Oversold. Annuities are holding tanks for your money, not ideal wealth-building vehicles. While money inside of them accumulates tax free, both contributions and withdrawals are taxable.

While I can see the need for fixed annuities in guaranteeing a monthly payment - you may consider investing your 401(k) lump-sum into them - their benefits are oversold when it comes to their 'variable' cousins.

Variables contain mutual funds and may offer any number of 'guarantees' such as 'lifetime benefits.' For every extra feature, though, you pay more in terms of annual fees. Although I like inflation-adjusting features, there are only a handful of these products on the market. Before you buy a variable, consult with a fee-only financial planner who has no financial stake in selling them to you. They can be minefields.

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1jtpTy6

Source : http://ift.tt/1jtpTy6

Why JGWPT Holdings (JGW) Stock Is Tanking On Wednesday



NEW YORK ( TheStreet) --Shares of JGWPT Holdings Inc. are plummeting -17.36% to $11 on Wednesday after the company said net income for the 2014 first quarter decreased to $34.5 million, from $89.7 million for the same period last year.Adjusted net income was $10.1 million for the most recent quarter versus $23.5 million from the year ago quarter.

The company, which provides liquidity to customers by purchasing structured settlements, annuity and lottery payments streams, reported a 25.4% decline in revenue to $136.6 million, compared to $182.3 million from the 2013 first quarter.

JGW data by YChartsSTOCKS TO BUY: TheStreet Quant Ratings has identified a handful of stocks that can potentially TRIPLE in the next 12 months. Learn more.

Stock quotes in this article: JGWPT

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1ju1KaN

Source : http://ift.tt/1ju1KaN

Detroit emergency manager pleads for state funds

Detroit emergency manager Kevyn Orr gives an overview of Detroit's bankruptcy the state Capitol in Lansing, Mich. / Mandi Wright, Detroit Free Press

DETROIT -- Detroit's emergency manager on Tuesday pleaded with state lawmakers to kick in $195 million in upfront cash as part of a grand bargain to help resolve the city's historic Chapter 9 bankruptcy - while some of city's largest creditors devised strategies to block the fund meant to shore up pensions and protect the city's art museum from having to sell its treasures to pay off debt.

'We have what we think is a reasonable plan, but to put it bluntly, we need your money,' emergency manager Kevyn Orr testified before the newly created state House Committee on Detroit's Recovery and Michigan's Future. 'If we don't get the state settlement, our creditors likely would not approve the plan.'

Orr wants the state to contribute the lump sum as part of an $816 million grand bargain fund that is the centerpiece of his restructuring plan because it limits cuts to pensioners and protects art by injecting new money into the situation.

A group of local and national foundations would contribute more than $366 million to the fund, but only if a sweeping settlement is reached and pensioners and others agree not to sue. The Detroit Institute of Arts, for its part, has agreed to raise $100 million.

The fund has drawn support from the city's major retiree groups. But financial creditors, including bond insurers and banks owed hundreds of millions of dollars are trying to kill the deal, arguing in court filings that the city should consider selling the art masterpieces. They say the current plan unfairly favors pensioners over city debt holders and investors.

The legal fight has emerged as one of the most important hurdles to a quick resolution of Detroit's bankruptcy. The conflict will culminate in a massive trial starting in July when U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes will decide the fate of the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history.

'I continue to believe that financial creditors have viable arguments, and while the push to sell the art would probably subside if the bargain were bigger and there were more seats at the table to receive the money, I don't think it's a slam dunk one way or the other,' said Melissa Jacoby, a University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill bankruptcy law professor who has been closely tracking the case.

The Detroit Free Press first reported Tuesday that the philanthropic foundations of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler are all considering donations to the DIA that could collectively total tens of millions of dollars. The Free Press also confirmed that DTE Energy, Quicken Loans billionaire Dan Gilbert's companies and the Los Angeles-based Getty Foundation are also weighing contributions to the DIA to help bring the grand bargain to the finish line. Representatives from the companies declined to talk amounts or say when they would make their decisions. Pensions at risk

The House committee's first hearing Tuesday began the process of considering an 11-bill package that will govern the state's potential contribution to the settlement.

The bills would attach some controversial conditions to the funding, including the creation of an oversight commission that would retain authority over the city's spending, borrowing and contracts for 20 years and the requirement that new Detroit employees receive 401(k)-style retirement plans instead of traditional defined-benefit pensions.

As part of the grand bargain funding from lawmakers and pledges from foundations, Detroit retirees would have to relinquish their right to sue the state over pension cuts in exchange for better treatment in the city's restructuring plan.

Civilian retirees would get 4.5% pension cuts and no more annual cost-of-living adjustment increases if they vote 'yes' on the city's restructuring plan and Lansing lawmakers also approve the state's contribution. Police and fire retirees would get no monthly pension cuts and would accept a decrease in COLA from 2.25% to about 1%.

If the state fails to contribute $195 million upfront - the statistical equivalent of $350 million spread out over 20 years - Detroit would lose the $366 million pledged by charitable foundations and the $100 million in donations the DIA is working to raise.

Without the grand bargain cash, some civilian pensioners could endure cuts of up to 40% when including the impact of the city's plan to claw back excessive annuity payments over the last 10 years.

'Without this settlement, we're going to have to go back to the drawing board,' Orr testified. 'And for some people, it would be catastrophic.'

A typical retiree with a $20,000 a year pension would drop to $12,000 a year without the state's participation. Retired police and firefighters, who don't get Social Security to supplement their retirement, would drop from $35,000 to about $20,000 a year, Orr said.

Most unsecured financial creditors would get about 10 cents on the dollar under Orr's current proposal, compared with as much as 60 cents on the dollar for civilian pensions. Pay now or pay later

For their part, state legislators on the Detroit committee signaled a willingness to consider their portion of the city's bankruptcy settlement.

'Detroit is a legal subdivision of the state. The state has a responsibility. It's an inseparable part of the state,' said Republican state Rep. John Walsh, the chairman of the committee and a supporter of the deal. 'This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to fix Detroit and do it right. We can pay now and do it right, or pay later.'

Walsh said if the settlement doesn't happen and cuts become more severe to pensioners, many would fall into the social safety net and end up costing the state $275 million. Some lawmakers, however, remain uncommitted to the package - which would pay the city with money from the state's rainy day fund in one lump sum. That fund would be paid back over 20 years with proceeds from a tobacco settlement the state receives each year.

Republican state Rep. Earl Poleski said he needs to hear more about the specific bills before he decides whether to support the cash infusion. 'All of us want to make sure Detroit emerges from bankruptcy sooner rather than later, but only in a responsible and reasonable way that protects the city and the rest of the state. ... We'll either be satisfied or we won't.'

How the state decides to pay back the rainy day fund is irrelevant to the bankruptcy proceedings, said Orr. 'Once we get the money in our hot little hands, how you repay yourself is up to you.'

The bills won't get an easy pass from Democrats or employee unions. Democratic state Rep. Thomas Stallworth said he doesn't mind oversight from the state.

'But the magnitude of the strings are a bit hard to swallow,' he said.

Lisa Howze, the director of governmental affairs for the city and a former state representative, said her boss, Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan, is concerned about the level of oversight contained in the bills.

'He'd like the ability to demonstrate that we're meeting the metrics and having some of that oversight lessened over time,' she said. 'Self determination is the goal, and that's the path that Detroit wants to be on.' Contributing: Tom Walsh of the Detroit Free Press

Read the original story: Detroit emergency manager pleads for state funds

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1loEQTC

Source : http://ift.tt/1loEQTC

Labour pressures Govt to publish Budget annuities reform evidence





Labour has tabled an amendment to the Finance Bill that would force the Treasury to publish the analysis undertaken before Chancellor George Osborne announced a radical shake-up of pensions tax rules.

Osborne stunned the industry during his Budget speech when he announced plans drastically liberalise pensions income rules.

The reforms, which come into effect from April next year, will mean anyone aged 55 or over will be able to take their entire pension pot as cash without being hit with a 55 per cent tax penalty. Instead, savers who do this will be taxed at their marginal rate.

Labour has proposed an amendment to the Finance Bill that would require the Government to publish any analysis on the impacts of the pension reforms prepared by the Treasury prior to the Budget.

The information Labour wants the Government to publish includes: any assessment of the impact of the pledge to offer everyone free, impartial, face-to-face retirement guidance; the distributional impact of the changes; any behavioural analysis undertaken; and the financial risk assessment.

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1qD2cgB

Source : http://ift.tt/1qD2cgB

Funeral home owner pleads guilty to money laundering





WICHITA, Kan. -

A Wichita funeral home owner has agreed to a federal plea deal in a money laundering case. Doug Watson owns Watson Funeral Home and was indicted by a grand jury in 2013. This week, he pleaded guilty as part of a plea agreement. The plea agreement is sealed so there's little detail until sentencing in July.

The original charges are four counts of money laundering. The counts say Watson knowingly and willing conducted financial transactions affecting interstate commerce which involved the proceeds of a specified unlawful activity. The four counts involve transactions totaling around $20,000. WHAT HAPPENED

In 2011, Watson was the focus on a year-long Factfinder 12 investigation. At that time, we questioned Watson about unethical practices - removing a body from a casket and reusing the casket, forging a signature on a funeral contract and overcharging customers. We also found the Kansas State Board of Mortuary Arts, the agency that licenses funeral homes, didn't do a thorough investigation. KSBMA did reopen the investigation after our report and ordered Watson to refund a family money, fined Watson $500, publicly censured him and required him to complete ten hours of continuing education in funeral home ethics. After we did our 2011 investigation, other families with connections to Watson started contacting us. They said he was not only unethical, but was befriending older women and stealing their money.

WAVA'S MONEY

When 91-year-old Wava Gruver died, she had less than $1,000 to her name. Gruver's niece, Judy Lienemann, said Gruver met Watson years before through church. Watson helped Gruver pre-arrange her funeral in 1996.

'She came to a family get together during the holidays and said she named Doug Watson, who owns a mortuary business, as executor of her estate,' Lienemann said. 'Nobody questioned it because she made her own decisions. She ran her own life.'

Most of Gruver's family lived out of state. She never married and Lienemann said Gruver worked hard to save money throughout her lifetime. She also received two large family inheritances.

Watson became Gruver's power of attorney in February 2007. This allowed him to write checks from her account. After our investigation aired in 2011, the family started looking into Gruver's finances and discovered most of her $300,000 was gone. Lienemann found checks Watson had written to himself for $75,000. He also wrote checks to his business, Family Centered Services, for $75,000, $40,000, $15,000 and $12,000. Lienemann only had access to about two dozen checks, but saw enough to revoke Watson's power of attorney. To this day, she has no idea what the money was used for.

'We were really surprised and upset about what we found,' Lienemann said. 'Her tax records were the first indication that all of her CD's had been cashed out with penalties. Annuities she had were also cashed. There was no reason for it.'

The family could do little because Watson was the legal power of attorney. Lienemann brought her information to the FBI and U.S. Attorney's office.

MORE CASES

Gruver's situation isn't the only time Watson befriended an elderly woman and took money. In May 2012, Watson reached a settlement to pay back $533,213 to the estate of Nadine Brotemarkle. In this case, Watson was not the power of attorney but had written six promissory notes, according to Larry Toomey, executor of the estate. As part of the settlement, Watson agreed to pay back $2500 per month.

WATSON'S LICENSE

Judy Lienemann said the worst part was that Watson's job as a funeral director is built on trust.

'He doesn't belong in that business,' Lienemann said. She urged people to carefully research power of attorney privileges.

'We hope your story may alert people to be careful who they give power of attorney to,' she said.

The Kansas Attorney General's office provides information about power of attorney. Here's what you should know.

We contacted the Kansas State Board of Mortuary Arts to find out the status of Watson's funeral license. Mack Smith, executive secretary, said the board will look over the information and decide what happens next. Watson could be fined, privately or publicly censured, have his license suspended or revoked. Smith said he stands by KSBMA's previous investigations.

Watson will be sentenced in July.

Original Post By: http://ift.tt/1k1nGhW

Source : http://ift.tt/1k1nGhW